The top legal affairs news stories from the weekend Ex-Cabinet minister Dominic Grieve threatens to oust Theresa May and form a Remainer ‘national unity’ government to push through fresh Brexit referendum [Mail Online] Government to face legal challenge over refusal to hold Mueller-style inquiry into Brexit referendum [The Independent] Theresa May is looking for “legal solution” to end the witch hunt of Troubles veterans [The Sun] US Supreme Court Opens New Term Without Ninth Justice in Place [Wall Street Journal] Waiters to be paid all tips under new law, Theresa May says [BBC News] Google may take emergency legal measures to protect its Android mobile business as it appeals against its record EU fine in the coming days [The Telegraph] Labour hits back in Kezia Dugdale legal fees row [The Scotsman] Lil Pump cancels his upcoming tour following legal issues [NME] Here’s what legal experts are saying about the SEC’s settlement with Elon Musk [Business Insider] “The sea is ours”: landlocked Bolivia hopes international court will reopen path to Pacific [The Guardian] Does the law hear women? [CNN] “I self identify as a trillionaire and demand to be treated accordingly.” [Legal Cheek Comments] Event: InsurTech, the law and new opportunities for future lawyers — with RPC [Legal Cheek] The post Monday morning round-up appeared first on Legal Cheek. from https://www.legalcheek.com/2018/10/monday-morning-round-up-1-october/
0 Comments
In 2016, Chicago experienced 780 homicides, making it the deadliest year in the city in nearly two decades. The first homicide of the year came at 2:20 a.m. on New Year's Day in the Grand Boulevard neighborhood on the South Side. Twenty-year-old DeAndre Holiday found himself on the wrong side of an argument half a mile from the edge of Washington Park when a man pulled out a handgun and shot him in the chest. I got there just as the police were stringing up yellow tape around the scene. I was a crime reporter for the Chicago Sun-Times then, tracking a never-ending string of shootings and violence. For more than a year, I had a police scanner near my desk and listened to the dispatcher say "we're getting a ticket of a person shot" and "shots fired," among other depressing crimes. I was working the overnight shift that night, as I usually did, when the call went out over the scanner. "One of us should go," my coworker said. When I got to the scene, it was silent, and a bitter wind ran through my overcoat. I walked up to the line looking for Holiday's body then saw it mangled in the street, partially covered by a white sheet. One of the cops asked me to step back because the police were tying up an extra line. I walked to the darkened sidewalk and watched the tape blow in the wind and the blue lights bounce off the brick homes and disappear into abandoned lots. The silence didn't last. One by one, I watched Holiday's friends and family members arrive in disbelief, then see his body. Devastation and raw emotion quickly overwhelmed them. One woman kept screaming, "Who shot him? That's my baby's daddy!" A woman who appeared to be in her 70s wailed over and over "Wake up!" She shrieked and screamed in a way I'd never heard before, as did the dozen or so others. Sometimes it was as if everyone were screaming at once. The cops moved an SUV in front of Holiday's body, and an officer took the older woman's hand and led her away. At one point, gunshots rang out a few blocks away. No one — not the police or the friends or family — looked surprised. That wasn't the first shooting I went to, but it was the first where I had witnessed such devastation. I thought I knew how to handle myself after scenes like that, but when I got home, back to the world I'd known before, I felt numb. A look I'll never forgetLast year, more than 4,000 people were shot in Chicago, and shootings have become so normalized that they rarely make the front page of the local papers, let alone the national news. About a month after Holiday's killing, as the Super Bowl was playing and my friends were posting pictures of their parties on social media, I was in the Sun-Times newsroom listening to the scanner scrolling through police zones. "All right, we're getting four people shot now," the dispatcher said. I pressed hold on the zone and listened. The dispatcher said the victims were all 15 years old. My editor told me not to go to the scene — no one was dead yet. But then I told her the ages. I raced my car down the highway to the Englewood neighborhood, also on the South Side, where the shooting had happened. I found a woman who looked to be in her 30s standing on the sidewalk with a dazed disposition. She told me she ran outside after hearing gunfire and kids screaming and found eight or nine teenagers on a porch. Four of them — three boys and a girl — were shot, and all were crying. Some were throwing up. Thankfully, they all survived. One of the kids told her that two men had walked up, asked "Are y'all good?" and then opened fire. I could see fear and trauma in her eyes. As she talked to me, her kids peeked out from behind the white curtain of their first-floor apartment. They looked terrified too. I'll never forget that. I sensed that they were scared not only because of the shooting but also because she was talking to me, a journalist. The neighbor seemed nervous to talk to me too. She asked me not to use her name, like most witnesses I talked to after shootings, and spoke quietly, as though she wanted to make sure no one heard her. It was only later that I learned the hard way that even appearing to give information to a journalist could be dangerous. 'You tryna get me killed?'A few months later, I was in the office very late one day, or early, depending on how you look at it. I heard on the scanner that a male had been shot in the head. The dispatcher didn't call it a 0110 — the Chicago police code for homicide — but it sounded like one. I drove to the scene to find out.
When I got there, a body was in the middle of the street, and there were only a few people around. I asked a guy walking down the sidewalk whether he knew what happened, and he told me something about where the shooters were standing. "Over there?" I asked, pointing to a trash can. "F--- you, man," he said. "You tryna get me killed?" He stormed off. It dawned on me that, with one flick of the wrist, I may have put him, and possibly myself, in danger. I felt awful. When I finally got to sleep that night, I dreamed that someone kept pointing a gun at me. I woke up screaming. I rushed to my computer, and there in my inbox was an email from a family member of the victim. The person was swearing at and threatening me. I couldn't get the screams out of my headBy July, I was having trouble relating to my friends and family. One night, I headed to a homicide scene in the neighborhood of Austin on the West Side. The trees were covering the city's notoriously golden street lamps, and it was really dark. The police had just taken the victim's body away and were taking down the yellow tape. I walked over to an older woman standing on the sidewalk. When she and I finished talking, I walked over to three men standing on the side of the house where the victim had been killed. I had my camera on my shoulder and motioned as if I wanted to ask them some questions. One of the men took one look at me and said, "You better get the f--- out of here." Another put his hand in his pants as though he had a gun holstered there. I had a sudden realization that all of the police officers had left the scene. The three of them started cursing at me and walking forward. My heart started racing. I said "All right" and turned and walked at a brisk but steady pace to my car, trying to show neither fear nor disrespect. When I got to my car, I looked back and saw them down the street, still yelling at me. I felt stupid as hell. I had been feeling weird since the New Year's Day shooting. For a day or two after visiting a scene, I would feel this peculiar kind of tunnel vision. It was as though I were looking at the world through a foggy television screen. I couldn't touch or focus on anything. I couldn't get the screams out of my head. While they were all different, they were also all the same: the pain of losing someone to violence. Few people in my life understood what was going on. The socioeconomics of murderIt wasn't just the screams or the violence that made the scenes hard to process. The causes of violence were readily on display at almost every scene. Most shootings in Chicago happen in about 10 of the city's 77 neighborhoods, on the South Side and the West Side. Poverty, racism, lack of opportunities, and more were apparent at every scene, even in the smallest details. It made the suffering harder to process. When I'd drive from the Sun-Times office downtown to the crime scenes, it was hard to miss the contrasts. The skyscrapers, plush condos, and designer stores gave way to run-down buildings, boarded-up schools and storefronts, and empty lots. At one crime scene, where a 28-year-old had been shot dead on a sidewalk, a young boy walked up and down the sidewalk along the police tape. No older than 7, he would stop and stare at the body every so often. As far as I could tell, it seemed normal to him. Another shooting I covered happened at a memorial event. Nearly 100 people had gathered to remember a friend killed on the block a few years prior when a man pulled out a gun and killed a man and a woman and injured two more. A 16-year-old girl at the memorial had an asthma attack during the shooting and died later at the hospital. At another, a 16-year-old boy was shot in his car after a man walked up and asked where he was from. "I'm not about that," the boy's friends told me he said. The man pulled out a gun and shot him in the head. "I just bought him a plane ticket to Mississippi, and now he's dead," the boy’s mother told me. It just felt as if bodies were piling up in my head. TiredThis is just a small fraction of the scenes I saw in Chicago. What's awful is that what I saw pales in comparison to what some reporters in the city have seen. And it certainly pales in comparison to what the victims, their families, and all those living in Chicago's hardest-hit neighborhoods have experienced. But by the time I put my two weeks in, I was tired of living in the dark. I was tired of having to take two or three Xanax to fall asleep, only to black out and then suddenly wake up four hours later in a feverish sweat. I was tired of the regular nightmares — my girlfriend at the time told me I would frequently scream in my sleep. I was tired of hearing the dispatcher say, "We're getting a ticket of a person shot. Person shot." I was tired of the constant guilt and I was tired of being threatened and screamed at by the people I was trying to help — though I certainly didn't blame them for their anger and emotion. It's been about eight months since I quit, and I'm still processing what I saw. I still get flashes of bodies or hear screams when I see flashing police lights or a broken car window. I think sometimes about how that year affected me — how it made me feel numb, how I wore a scowl I couldn't seem to shake. Then I think about what I might be like if I grew up in one of those neighborhoods I went to so often. SEE ALSO: 'The worst I've ever seen it': 11 shot dead, 63 more wounded in Chicago over the weekend Join the conversation about this story » NOW WATCH: 7 outdoor adventures that are worth the hike from https://www.businessinsider.com/what-i-saw-crime-reporter-chicago-2017-7 Freedom means different things to different people. But Freedom House, an independent watchdog organization that releases an annual report on freedom around the world, measures it in terms of civil liberties and political rights. Their annual report, Freedom in the World, "operates from the assumption that freedom for all people is best achieved in liberal democratic societies." In 2018, more than 130 in-house and external analysts and advisers from academia, think tanks, and human rights institutions created the report by collecting data from media, research articles, government documents, and other sources. That data was then used to score a country's political rights on a scale of 0-40 and its civil liberties on a scale of 0-60. Freedom House measured political rights by the degree with which a country's elections are free and fair, as well as by how much political pluralism and participation there is. Civil liberties, on the other hand, were measured by how free and independent the media is and how much freedom of expression and assembly there is. In the ranking below, countries with a shared freedom rating were listed by alphabetical order, except for the three countries that received the top score. Check out the 27 countries with the most freedom below: SEE ALSO: FBI data reveals some of the most violent cities in nearly every state 27. United KingdomThe United Kingdom received a score of 95 in Freedom House's 2017 report, losing five civil liberties points in the freedom of expression and belief, rule of law, and individual rights categories. 26. TuvaluTuvalu also received a score of 94 in Freedom House's 2017 report. 25. SpainSpain also received a score of 94 in Freedom House's 2017 report, losing two political rights points under the functioning of government category, and four civil liberties points under the freedom of expression, rule of law, individual rights, and associational and organizational categories.
See the rest of the story at Business Insider from https://www.businessinsider.com/countries-most-freedom-in-the-world-2018-4
FBI agents were homing in on a potential witness to interview on Friday night, shortly after President Donald Trump authorized the agency to conduct a supplemental background check on Judge Brett Kavanaugh, Trump's nominee for the Supreme Court, sources in a Los Angeles Times report published Friday. FBI agents reportedly aimed to schedule an interview with one of the two additional women who came forward with their own accusations of sexual misconduct involving Kavanaugh. Christine Blasey Ford, a California-based professor who alleged Kavanaugh was "stumbling drunk" when he sexually assaulted her during a small party in the 1980s, was the first accuser who was publicly identified. Following the publication of Ford's account in a Washington Post report on September 16, Deborah Ramirez, a fellow Yale classmate, and Julie Swetnick, a woman who claimed to have witnessed Kavanaugh display "abusive and physically aggressive behavior toward girls," came forward with their own reports about Kavanaugh. It was unclear if the woman the FBI reportedly took interest in on Friday was either Ramirez and Swetnick — the LA Times report did not reveal the woman's identity. The attorneys for one of the two women from the report were reportedly contacted by the FBI to schedule an interview "as early as tonight," a source for The Times said. The sources added that the process could start sometime during the weekend. On Thursday, lawmakers from the Senate Judiciary Committee listened to emotional testimonies from both Kavanaugh and Ford. Ford recounted how Kavanaugh pinned her to a bed, groped her over her clothes, and covered her mouth with his hand when she started to yell. Kavanaugh "categorically and unequivocally" denied the allegation, but stopped short of claiming Ford had fabricated the incident. Asked multiple times by lawmakers if he believed an FBI investigation would be prudent, Kavanaugh dodged the question and deferred the decision to the Judiciary Committee. "I welcome whatever the committee wants to do, because I'm telling the truth," Kavanaugh said during the hearing. On Friday, the committee voted along party lines to move Kavanaugh's nomination to the Senate floor. During the procedural vote, Republican Sen. Jeff Flake of Arizona conditioned his approval by asking that an FBI investigation, one that was "limited in time and scope," be conducted prior to a formal vote by the entire Senate. The final confirmation vote for Kavanaugh is tentatively scheduled for Tuesday. Join the conversation about this story » NOW WATCH: Inside the Trump 'MAGA' hat factory from https://www.businessinsider.com/fbi-agents-interview-brett-kavanaugh-accuser-investigation-christine-ford-2018-9 Phone-hacking lawyer Mark Lewis to face disciplinary tribunal over offensive social media posts9/28/2018 The allegations are as of yet unproven High-flying media lawyer Mark Lewis is to face a disciplinary tribunal over allegations he posted “offensive” comments on social media, according to a notice published by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA). It is alleged that on 26 May 2017, Lewis — who shot to fame representing the Dowler family in their case against the News of the World — used his Facebook account to “publicly post offensive and profane communications towards a third party”. It is further alleged that between July 2015 and 2016, Lewis, a partner at London law firm Seddons, used his Twitter account, which publicly identified him as a solicitor, to “post offensive and profane communications”. The allegations are subject to a hearing before the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) and are as of yet unproven. In a statement, Lewis said “it would not be appropriate to comment save that I am defending these allegations”. He continued:
In today’s notice, the SRA stresses that it does not condone the actions of any individuals involved in exchanges with Lewis on Twitter, during which the offensive and profane communications are alleged to have been made. A spokesperson for Seddons confirmed Lewis has tendered his resignation as a partner as he will soon be emigrating to Israel. The post Phone-hacking lawyer Mark Lewis to face disciplinary tribunal over ‘offensive’ social media posts appeared first on Legal Cheek. from https://www.legalcheek.com/2018/09/phone-hacking-lawyer-mark-lewis-to-face-disciplinary-tribunal-over-offensive-social-media-posts/ Stephen Colbert mocks Brett Kavanaugh's blistering Senate hearing: 'Please save your indignation'9/28/2018
Stephen Colbert on Thursday criticized the "indignation" Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh showed in his Senate Judiciary Committee hearing earlier that day, following the sworn testimony of Christine Blasey Ford, who accused Kavanaugh of sexual assault before the committee. Colbert started his monologue by playing clips of conservative commentators on Fox News calling Ford's testimony "very sympathetic," "exceptionally credible," and "a disaster for Republicans." The "Late Show" host then turned to Kavanaugh's angry, impassioned defense of himself and attacks on the hearing's process. "Perhaps the Kavanaugh quote that sticks with me is his passionate condemnation of the hearing and its repercussions," Colbert said. "You sowed the wind for decades to come," Kavanaugh said in his opening statement at the hearing, in an extended condemnation of Democratic senators. "I fear that the whole country will reap the whirlwind." "You really need a better weatherman," Colbert said. "Because let me tell you, brother, this is the whirlwind, and the wind was sown when Donald Trump had 19 credible allegations of sexual assault against him, bragged about sexual assault on tape. And your Republican buddies up on that committee said, 'Yeah, but we want our guy on the Supreme Court' — and that's you, Brett. That doesn't mean you're guilty, but please, save your indignation that, finally, someone is taking one woman's accusation of sexual assault seriously." The "Late Show" host then showed a clip of Kavanaugh saying at the hearing, “Today, I have to say, I fear for the future." "#MeToo," Colbert replied. Watch the monologue below: SEE ALSO: Here's an evolving count of which senators are voting for Trump's Supreme Court pick Join the conversation about this story » NOW WATCH: A top movie actor reveals how he learns different accents from https://www.businessinsider.com/stephen-colbert-mocks-brett-kavanaugh-senate-hearing-video-2018-9 In 1990, after a record high 2,262 homicides, some called New York City the "murder capital" of the country. But since then, the murder rate has steadily declined. The Big Apple had about 290 homicides in 2017, the lowest in 70 years, according to the New York Daily News. Some have even dubbed today's NYC "the safest big city" in the US. To get a better sense of what NYC's streets are like these days, we spent three nights with NY Daily News crime reporter Kerry Burke, considered by many to be the best in the city. Burke, 55, reported from ground zero on 9/11, helped break the Eric Garner story, and was even on a few episodes of Bravo's "Tabloid Wars" in 2006. He said he had been to roughly four shootings a week since he started the job 16 years ago. The first night we spent with Kerry passed with few incidents — perhaps a sign of the safer times. But the last two nights told a different story. Here's what we saw. (This story was originally published in September 2017.) DON'T MISS: I covered murders during Chicago's deadliest year in decades — here's what I saw Night 1: I met Burke in the Bronx while he was trying to find a man who had just been acquitted on murder charges."How are ya, Mr. Brown?" he said in a Boston accent. Burke, who grew up in Boston's Dorchester housing projects, was rather formal at first, but switched right away to "bro" or "brotha," like he called almost every other guy I met with him. He filled me in on the details about the man he was looking for before we walked to the guy's last known address. Residents in the building told him the man no longer lived there, so Burke asked people in other buildings and nearby stores whether they knew him. "Bodegas are the best," he said. "They know everything that goes on in the neighborhood, and they know everybody." He walked into one unlocked neighboring apartment building and knocked on doors.Burke was adept at talking to and gaining the trust of all different sorts of people, and he stressed the importance of being polite. "Maybe it's because I'm a troubled Catholic that I always say thank you," Burke said, adding that he "might have to come back" to get more information too. After about an hour or so, Burke was able to get the man's phone number but was unable to reach him. He later heard that a murder suspect was being questioned at the 32nd precinct and decided to go wait outside in the hopes of getting a statement when the suspect walked out. Around 11 p.m., the suspect's cousin walked out of the precinct. Burke asked him a few questions but didn't get much.Throughout the eight hours I spent with Burke that first night, there were no homicides and only one shooting — a man hit in the buttocks. The victim was immediately stabilized, and since the incident was not serious and happened more than an hour away from us, we didn't go. I took the lack of homicides or serious shootings during Burke's shift — especially given it was a Friday night — as a good sign. But it was only the first night. See the rest of the story at Business Insider from https://www.businessinsider.com/how-safe-is-new-york-city-murder-rate-shadowing-nyc-crime-reporter-2017-10 That escalated quickly An immigration barrister at One Pump Court received a dressing down from Twitter users this week after appearing to suggest that white people can identify as black. The bizarre Twitter spat kicked off when London-based barrister Allan Briddock responded to a tweet linking to an article concerning Rachel Dolezal, a white civil rights activist who posed as an African American woman. The user who tweeted the article asked why it was deemed acceptable for a man to identify as a woman but wrong for a white person to identify as black. Responding to the tweet, Briddock argued that self-identification was “quite common” and that an individual has the right to identify as black or white.
Sarah Phillimore, a family law specialist at St John’s Chambers, didn’t agree:
When pushed as to whether anyone could identify as anything, the One Pump Court barrister claimed self-identification applied in cases concerning “gender, sexuality, race, ethnicity, religion [and] disability”.
Briddock’s tweets — which were first spotted by RollOnFriday — triggered a flurry of responses ranging from the amused to the outraged:
Responding to Rainbow Ninja’s tweet, Briddock stressed that “disability is not always visible” and it is “not up to someone else to decide if you or me or anyone else is disabled.” With the dust now settled, Briddock told us: “I involved myself in the thread on the basis of my work concerning transgender equality and the problem at the moment of denying trans people’s identities. There is a huge amount of abuse, particularly online, of the trans community and the tweet I originally replied to seemed to be suggesting being trans is a choice.” He continued:
The post Barrister draws criticism on Twitter over claims white people can identify as black appeared first on Legal Cheek. from https://www.legalcheek.com/2018/09/barrister-draws-criticism-on-twitter-over-claims-white-people-can-identify-as-black/ Now the scientists are getting involved The University of Manchester has launched an ambitious new lawtech project that brings together academics from its schools of law, business and computer science with corporate law firms Freshfields and DWF. The collaboration, badged ‘The Manchester LegalTech Consortium’, has dual research and teaching aims. On the research side, it aims to pool ideas across disciplines to come up with new lawtech applications that can be used in practice to boost the efficiency of the legal profession. Freshfields and DWF will provide an arena to trial what the boffins come up with. Teaching-wise, Manchester Uni will bring in Freshies and DWF lawyers, alongside business and computer science academics, to deliver the new lawtech and access to justice module it is developing with legal technology company Neota Logic. There’s also a wider brief to contribute to public policy debate on innovation in law. This may see ideas offered about content for the new solicitor super-exam that is set to replace the Legal Practice Course (LPC) in 2020, although a question about this by Manchester University Professor Claire McGourlay at the unveiling of the project last night at DWF in Manchester did not elicit a conclusive response. Also at the launch was Ministry of Justice big wig Lord Keen, who spoke about his high hopes for what the cross-disciplinary teams might achieve, as he backed a legal profession tech revolution. Notably, Keen was prepared to put a timescale on his predictions, unlike many lawtech commentators, as he told the audience:
Manchester is becoming something of a legal IT hub, with Freshfields and DWF among a host of firm’s which have embraced innovation in the city. Addleshaw Goddard and Pinsent Masons are other tech leaders — each scoring an A* for tech savvy in this year’s Legal Cheek Trainee and Junior Lawyers Survey — which have large bases in the city. Manchester University professor of innovation management Andrew James said:
Hear more about what Manchester University, Freshfields and DWF are doing at the Legal Cheek Future of Legal Education and Training Conference 2019 in May next year. The post Manchester Uni’s law, business and computer science departments join forces with Freshfields and DWF for new lawtech research and teaching project appeared first on Legal Cheek. from https://www.legalcheek.com/2018/09/manchester-unis-law-business-and-computer-science-departments-join-forces-with-freshfields-and-dwf-for-new-lawtech-research-and-teaching-project/ Internet wrong’un uses image of 2 Bedford Row’s Michael Wolkind QC A would-be Twitter fraudster has used an image of one of the country’s most recognisable criminal silks as part of an ambitious attempt to get members of the public to part with their hard-earned cash. At first glance you’d be forgiven for thinking that the @EsqRichards Twitter account (bottom left) was the real deal: leather-bound law books, unassuming name and a wigged barrister profile pic all help create a veneer of legitimacy. Then, upon closer inspection, you’ll realise “David Richards (ESQ)” bears an uncanny resemblance to 2 Bedford Row’s Michael Wolkind QC and that the account is clearly a fake — a fake that is apparently attempting to scam people. Profile image aside, Legal Cheek would like to stress that Wolkind is in no way connected to the bogus account. One of those targeted was The Guardian‘s media editor Jim Waterson, who received a direct message from the dodgy account yesterday afternoon. Waterson subsequently tweeted a screenshot of the message, in which the scammer claims to be seeking a business partner to “assist in the securing of a Late Client [sic] funds ($15,000,000.00 USD). The message goes on to say that the deal will be of “great mutual benefit” and that the recipient should email them for further details.
In a statement to Legal Cheek, Wolkind said:
Perhaps it was Wolkind’s high-profile (and rather eye-catching) online presence that made fraudsters go for his image, as opposed to another member of the bar’s. Last year, Wolkind was reprimanded and hit with a £1,000 fine for statements made on his website. Topcriminalqc.co.uk contained a host of claims which the Bar Standards Board (BSB) deemed “likely to diminish the trust and confidence which the public placed in him”. Highlights included: “Michael Wolkind QC was the UK’s top criminal barrister” and a client testimonial expressing his view that “Michael Wolkind QC could get Stevie Wonder a driving licence”. This, however, isn’t the first time Wolkind has been the victim of a fake online profile. Legal Cheek reported in 2015 that someone had created a “premium” LinkedIn account using a real image of the 2 Bedford Row silk along with what appeared to be some genuine information. However, other parts of the profile clearly revealed it was an online prank, such as the inclusion of his “2nd in Primary School Egg and Spoon Race” under the page’s awards and honours section. The post Twitter fraudster impersonates top criminal QC in unsophisticated money wiring scam appeared first on Legal Cheek. from https://www.legalcheek.com/2018/09/itter-fraudster-impersonates-top-criminal-qc-in-unsophisticated-money-wiring/ |
AuthorHi I am Alana Smith 35 years old living in New York. I am working as an assistant in local law office. I like to share legal news with people to educate them. Archives
April 2019
Categories |