One of Trump's first major solutions to the opioid crisis could actually make the problem worse10/31/2017
Thousands of drug courts have sprung up across the country since the first was created in 1989, with the goal of diverting certain defendants with drug abuse and addiction issues to treatment, rather than prison. The White House commission's report, however, found that fewer than one-third of federal judicial districts and just 44% of US counties had drug courts as of 2015. Drug courts are geared toward criminal defendants arrested on low-level possession charges, or other drug-driven crimes that could carry criminal penalties, Chris Deutsch, communications director for the National Association of Drug Court Professionals, told Business Insider earlier this year. The push towards drug courts, Deutsch said, is part of a larger movement toward tailored, evidence-based criminal justice programs that serve different populations and needs. "Rather than entangling someone in the system for a low-level possession, they can be diverted," Deutsch said. "We need systems in place that — no matter where you are in the system — you are being diverted based on an assessment. There should be an evidence-based program for you." Deutsch declined on Tuesday to comment on the White House commission's draft report before its formal release. Drug courts have come under scrutiny by public health experts who say that incorporating the criminal justice system into treatment for a disease such as opioid-use disorder is harmful and can often result in punishing participants by sending them to prison if they relapse, as most people addicted to opioids do. Many of the cases that come before drug courts shouldn't touch the criminal justice system at all, according to Mae Quinn, director of the MacArthur Justice Center in St. Louis, a public interest law firm that uses litigation as a tool to provoke criminal justice reform. "When we try to put a criminal justice overlay over what should be a public health issue, it's not a good match," Quinn told Business Insider earlier this year. "We need community-based voluntary options. You shouldn't have to be arrested to get access to a program." Mixing healthcare and criminal justiceDrug courts are also notorious for providing neglectful care to their participants, according to David Patterson, a public health expert at Washington University in St. Louis. Patterson, who has worked on drug courts in Kentucky and has worked in treatment for more than 15 years, said he has seen drug courts that push participants into signing contracts that bind them to questionable treatment methods such as writing papers, attending boot camps, and various forms of therapy that, in some cases amount, to "pseudoscience." Another pitfall is that in the drug court system, judges essentially take on the roles of "clinical treatment directors," Patterson said, allowing them vast discretion to determine treatment options or jail or prison time, based on participants' adherence to the court's rules. "There is such political branding of drug courts that they are able to treat people however they want to," Patterson told Business Insider earlier this year. Andi Peterson, a 26-year-old Utah resident, was one such participant. Peterson told Business Insider last year that she was in and out of drug court for nearly two years after a felony arrest for narcotics possession, where she repeatedly relapsed, was put in jail for months at a time, and eventually faced up to 15 years in state prison. Peterson said she was unable to stay off opioids in drug court, despite the treatment provided. She eventually was successful while serving a year in prison, after which she was released. She has stayed in recovery since. Stories like Peterson's, said Patterson, are what make him wary of drug courts. "[The court takes] custody of people with a medical illness and they treat them like it's a criminal issue. That's malpractice," Patterson added. "This would never happen to people with cancer, but because they are an addict they get away with it." Vivitrol and drug courtsOne issue in particular that has sprung up over the last five years has been the proliferation of drug courts that mandate participants use Vivitrol, a monthly injection that blocks opioid receptors in the brain. Though a recent study suggests some success for Vivitrol, most addiction experts recommend maintenance treatments like Suboxone or methadone despite those treatments having some potential for diversion or abuse. "The #1 recommended treatment across the world is indefinite maintainence treatment on Suboxone or methadone. It's not controversial except in the minds of people who don't like science," Mark Willenbring, a leading addiction psychiatrist who runs Alltyr, a treatment clinic in Minneapolis, told Business Insider last month. The pharmaceutical company Alkermes, the company behind Vivitrol, drew headlines recently after investigations by ProPublica, The New York Times, and the Associated Press reported how the company grew its business from $30 million in 2015 to $209 million a year later, primarily by marketing Vivitrol directly to hundreds of drug courts, particularly to judges in areas hard-hit by opioids who are wary of maintainence treatment. It is as yet unclear how or when the federal drug courts would be established or what kind of treatment modality they would use. Establishing more drug courts was just one of 53 recommendations contained in the commission's report, according to STAT News. President Donald Trump on October 26 declared the opioid crisis a "national public health emergency" and announced several measures the federal government plans to take to address the issue. SEE ALSO: Trump just declared the opioid crisis a 'public health emergency' — here's what that means DON'T MISS: Recovering heroin addict explains why it's so hard to stay clean — even in rehab Join the conversation about this story » from http://www.businessinsider.com/opioid-crisis-trump-commission-recommends-nationwide-drug-courts-addiction-treatment-2017-10
0 Comments
He says his wife had no idea The husband of a now ex-Linklaters lawyer has pleaded guilty to insider trading after he allegedly used confidential information from a big money M&A deal to make thousands of dollars on the stock exchange. According to Reuters, Fei Yan — a research scientist at Massachusetts Institute of Technology — is accused of using insider information concerning Linklaters’ client Sibanye Gold and its planned $2.2 billion (£1.7 billion) acquisition of Stillwater Mining. Interestingly Yan’s wife, Menglu Wang, was involved in the acquisition deal, as she was an associate in the firm’s New York office. She was swiftly suspended following her husband’s arrest and has since left the firm. Arrested in July, Yan was accused by United States’ prosecutors of purchasing stock options in Stillwater in 2016, before offloading them on the day the deal was announced. The report claims that the researcher made a profit of more than $100,000 (£75,000). Wang has not faced any charges. Yan pleaded guilty to charges that he engaged in insider trading before a Boston court on Monday. He maintains that his lawyer spouse was not aware of what he was up to. In a statement he said:
Harvard Law School grad Wang joined Linklaters in 2015 as an associate in the outfit’s corporate, mergers and acquisitions group, according to her LinkedIn profile. Her lawyer, Wayne Gosnell of Clayman & Rosenberg LLP, said:
Linklaters declined to comment. The post Husband of ex-Linklaters associate admits using confidential info from M&A deal his wife was working on to make £75,000 stock market profit appeared first on Legal Cheek. from https://www.legalcheek.com/2017/10/husband-of-ex-linklaters-associate-admits-using-confidential-info-from-ma-deal-his-wife-was-working-on-to-make-75000-stock-market-profit/ Tort law pumpkins and Gargoyles on Doughty Street Today is the day we’ve all been waiting for: the perfect chance to stock up on family-size packs of Haribo, struggle to fish novelty contact lenses out of your eyes and sift through questionable Facebook photos of your friends in Hugh Hefner/Playboy bunny costumes. Some lawyers love it, UCL senior lecturer Steven Vaughan stating this morning:
Others, like Hardwicke barrister PJ Kirby QC, don’t:
Whatever your stance, Legal Cheek has been doing some Halloween-inspired social media digging and has found a plethora of law-themed costumes and decorations we don’t think you’ll be unable to resist raising a smile at. Here are 11 of the best: 1. Tort law pumpkinAny student that’s had to navigate the weird world of oil-leaking vessels and cricket balls being hit out of grounds will know studying tort law can be pretty scary. So why not channel this into your pumpkin carving? 2. Gargoyles and ghouls on Doughty StreetWe’re happy to see one Halloween-happy resident got into the spirit of things, creatively decorating the street best known among lawyers for housing its namesake chambers.
3. Elle WoodsThis Legally Blonde icon is popular among law students, so why not bend and snap your way through this spooky holiday?
4. The Hunting ActPassed in 2004, this piece of legislation banned hunting unless it is categorised as exempt (Schedule 1). 5. Ruth GinsburgWe were hard pushed to find any UK Supreme Court justice costumes this year, but party-goers paying homage to Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) judge Ruth Ginsburg were all over the show. 6. Ruth Vader GinsburgWhy not?
7. Injury lawyerMobile phone, wig and tie in place, this personal injury specialist is here to help with your pumpkin punch-induced trips and getting tangled in fake cobwebs slips.
8. Judges galoreIf one sassy SCOTUS judge wasn’t enough for you, here’s a bunch of them. 9. Ghost, Ghoul & GoblinThey say lawyers love a good deal, but a deal with the devil?
10. Judge JudyWe think this Twitter user captured TV star and family law specialist Judith Sheindlin perfectly.
11. Student loansThe most terrifying sight of all…
Happy Halloween! The post 11 photos from Halloween any lawyer will appreciate appeared first on Legal Cheek. from https://www.legalcheek.com/2017/10/11-photos-from-halloween-only-lawyers-will-appreciate/ But results should be approached with caution A case-predicting robot has proved victorious in a man vs machine challenge previously described as “arrogant nonsense” by a top solicitor. The prediction-off was organised by a bunch of Cambridge law students and graduates who first broke into the lawtech scene with their crime-identifying LawBot. Several rebrands later, the team is now called CaseCrunch and decided to prove its tech’s worth by pitting it against the brainpower of some of the country’s top lawyers. According to CaseCrunch 112 lawyers took part in the challenge, these hailing from the likes of Allen & Overy, DLA Piper, Bird & Bird, Berwin Leighton Paisner and Eversheds Sutherland. These legal eagles were presented with factual scenarios of payment protection insurance (PPI) claims and were asked what the outcome of the claim would be, while the same scenarios were fed through CaseCrunch’s bot for predicting too. Two judges, a Cambridge law lecturer and a big data director, were tasked with making sure the challenge was fair. CaseCrunch has now announced its win over the human teams, scoring an accuracy of 87% compared to lawyers’ 62%. The figures are impressive, but should lawyers be worried? Pinsent Masons‘ David Halliwell, speaking before the result was revealed, did note a machine victory could be a nightmare for lawyers:
But let’s approach this victory with caution. In the words of CaseCrunch’s scientific director, Ludwig Bull:
What the robot cannot do, at this stage anyway, is emulate the personable nature of legal services. This was the ammunition behind top litigation lawyer David Greene’s CaseCrunch-directed outburst, in which he described the challenge as “arrogant nonsense”. Greene later told Legal Cheek:
In response, Bull told us: “machines will not replace lawyers and [we aren’t] trying to change that. Machines can help lawyers understand the law and maybe even make it clearer and more just.” The post City firms’ ‘worst nightmare’ realised? Machines victorious in lawyer vs robot challenge appeared first on Legal Cheek. from https://www.legalcheek.com/2017/10/city-firms-worst-nightmare-machines-victorious-in-lawyer-vs-robot-challenge/ The morning’s top legal affairs news stories Impact of cuts to legal aid to come under review [The Guardian] Human rights lawyer: prisoner votes plan is ‘cynical’ [BBC News] Couples could divorce entirely online in government bid to save £250m and shake up court system [The Sun] Google slams EU for record-breaking fine in court appeal [Independent] Belgium sets up English-language court to cash in on Brexit [News 24] Court bars Donald Trump from banning transgender people from military [Metro] Artificial intelligence takes the drudgery out of legal work [Globe and Mail] Judge thinks suspect who asked for a ‘lawyer, dawg,’ was asking for a ‘lawyer dog’ [New York Magazine] Egyptian lawyer says raping women in revealing clothing is ‘national duty’ [Euronews] Lawyer slams Holyrood sexual harassment ‘silence’ [BBC News] Judge can’t believe she’s been added to ‘known terrorist list’ [Above The Law] Key graduate recruitment deadlines calendar [Legal Cheek Careers] Where do you draw the line in the legal world when social lives, due to the time spent in the office, cross with personal lives..? [Legal Cheek comments] The post Morning round-up: Tuesday 31 October appeared first on Legal Cheek. from https://www.legalcheek.com/2017/10/morning-round-up-tuesday-31-october/
They were the first indictments in special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 US elections, and whether members of the Trump campaign colluded with Moscow. Here's a rundown of everything we learned on Monday: The indictments
The reactions
Papadopoulos pleads guilty
Other developments
SEE ALSO: Mueller just threw a huge wrench in Trump's attempts to distance himself from Manafort DON'T MISS: New details about an early Trump adviser completely change the timeline of Russia's election interference Join the conversation about this story » NOW WATCH: Watch Paul Manafort — Trump's former campaign chairman — surrender to the FBI from http://www.businessinsider.com/mueller-indictments-explained-manafort-gates-papadopoulos-trump-russia-2017-10
Manafort walked into the FBI's field office with his lawyer Kevin Downing in Washington, DC, at about 8:15 a.m. on Monday. An FBI agent greeted him and his lawyer as they entered the building. Manafort and Gates appeared for their arraignment at around 1:30 p.m. and pleaded not guilty, according to CNN. The indictment was unsealed Monday morning, and it contains 12 counts: conspiracy against the United States, conspiracy to launder money, unregistered agent of a foreign principal, false and misleading FARA statements, false statements, and seven counts of failure to file reports of foreign bank and financial accounts. The government set bail for Manafort at $10 million, according to CNN. Read the full indictment below:Manafort has been at the center of the special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into whether Trump's presidential campaign colluded with Moscow before the 2016 election. The indictments against Manafort and Gates are the first since James Comey launched the investigation over a year ago. Mueller took over the investigation after Comey was fired as FBI director in May. Manafort was forced to step down as Trump's campaign chairman in August 2016, but Gates stayed and worked on Trump's transition team. He was ousted from a pro-Trump lobbying group in April amid questions about Russia's election interference, but he continued to visit the White House as late as June, according to The Daily Beast. Legal experts speculated over the weekend, after news of the sealed indictments broke Friday, that Mueller would arrest Manafort in an effort to get him to "flip" against Trump. Trump tweeted on Monday that the allegations came "years ago, before Paul Manafort was part of the Trump campaign. But why aren't Crooked Hillary & the Dems the focus?????" "Also, there is NO COLLUSION!" he added in a follow-up tweet. The FBI conducted a predawn raid on Manafort's home in July. Manafort was told at the time that he would be indicted, according to his longtime friend Roger Stone. Investigators were looking for tax documents and foreign banking records that are typically sought when investigating violations of the Bank Secrecy Act. Manafort has been associated with at least 15 bank accounts and 10 companies in Cyprus, dating back to 2007, NBC News reported in March, and the FBI has issued grand-jury subpoenas to several banks for Manafort's records. Gates' name appears on documents linked to many of those Cyprus companies, according to The New York Times. BuzzFeed reported on Sunday that the FBI was looking at 13 suspicious wire transfers made by Manafort-linked offshore companies from 2012 to 2013. Manafort's representatives have said he has been cooperating with investigators' requests for relevant documents. But the search warrant obtained by the FBI in July indicated that Mueller managed to convince a federal judge that Manafort would try to conceal or destroy documents subpoenaed by a grand jury. The indictments issued Friday were sealed, and Manafort's attorneys did not receive a target letter, raising similar questions about whether Mueller thought Manafort would try to flee or destroy evidence if he were notified of his impending arrest three days beforehand. Legal experts saw the July raid as a sign that something very serious was coming. A former Department of Justice spokesman, Matthew Miller, said a raid coming months into an investigation in which the subject's attorneys had been speaking with, and presumably cooperating with, the DOJ "suggests something serious." "Manafort's representatives have been insisting for months that he is cooperating with these investigations, and if you are really cooperating, DOJ typically doesn't need to raid your house — they'll trust you to respond fully to a subpoena," Miller said at the time. Manafort's ties to Russia came under scrutiny in August of last year, when The New York Times discovered that a pro-Russian political party in Ukraine designated him $12.7 million in undisclosed cash payments. Manafort, a longtime Republican operative, had advised the party and its former leader Viktor Yanukovych for nearly a decade. On March 22, the Associated Press reported that Manafort was paid $10 million from 2006 to 2009 to lobby on behalf of the Russian billionaire Oleg Deripaska, a close ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin, using a strategic "model" that the AP said Manafort wrote would "greatly benefit the Putin Government if employed at the correct levels with the appropriate commitment to success." Manafort has insisted that he has never received any illicit cash payments. But he has a "pattern" of using shell companies to purchase homes "in all-cash deals," as WNYC has reported, and then transferring those properties into his name for no money and taking out large mortgages against them. Manafort's tendency to form shell companies to purchase real estate is not illegal. But it has raised questions about how much Manafort has been paid throughout his decades as a political consultant — and who paid him. New York's attorney general, Eric Schneiderman, was recruited last month to help investigate Manafort for possible financial crimes and money laundering, and the IRS' criminal-investigations unit joined the investigation to examine similar issues. The Wall Street Journal reported last week that Manafort was the subject of a new money-laundering investigation in New York. Manafort also attended a meeting last year at Trump Tower with Trump's son Donald Trump Jr. and son-in-law Jared Kushner as well as two Russian lobbyists who were said to have offered dirt on Hillary Clinton. DON'T MISS: Mueller just threw a huge wrench in Trump's attempts to distance himself from Manafort Join the conversation about this story » from http://www.businessinsider.com/paul-manafort-indicted-by-special-counsel-robert-mueller-and-told-to-surrender-2017-10 • Special counsel Robert Mueller slapped Paul Manafort, US President Donald Trump's former campaign manager, with numerous charges Monday. • Manafort's wife Kathleen is a lawyer who has largely stayed out of the public eye.
The indictment accuses Manafort of laundering $18 million from 2006 to 2016 to keep up his "lavish lifestyle." While the investigation into the political operative's dealings has dominated the headlines for months, his wife Kathleen Bond Manafort has largely stayed out of the news cycle. But she's very much been a presence during the investigation. The couple was in bed together when FBI agents conducted a pre-dawn raid of their Alexandria, Virginia house in July. CNN reported the experience was a "jarring event" for the couple, and that Kathleen was even searched for weapons, as per standard FBI procedure. Reports indicate the couple was married on August 12, 1978, according to Heavy.com. It's unclear how they first met. Kathleen is a lawyer who graduated from George Washington University in 1979, the year after she reportedly married her husband. She has given money to her alma mater over the years, and is listed as a donor in the school's president's report for the years of 1986, 1990, and 1992, according to Archive.org. In 1984, the couple attended a state dinner for Dominican Republic President Salvador Jorge Blanco, the Washington Post reported. Manafort was a partner in the DC lobbying firm Black, Manafort and Stone at the time. The Manaforts have two daughters — Jessica, who was born in 1982 and Andrea, who was born in 1985. Kathleen subsequently earned her J.D. from Georgetown in 1988, and passed the Virginia bar the same year, according to The Washington Post. Kathleen was also admitted to the DC bar in 1991. Her various degrees are listed in online legal databases like LegalDirectories.com and Lawyers.com. Over the years, Kathleen had a hand in some of the couple's major purchases. The Manaforts have bought numerous in Florida, Virginia, New York, according to NBC, including a Trump Tower apartment together in 2006 and a horse farm in Wellington, Florida. In 2003, San Diego — one of the horses owned by the couple — was stolen, according to "A Sunday Horse: Inside the Grand Prix Show Jumping Circuit" by Vicky Moon. The Manaforts — in partnership with the Wellington Equestrian Alliance — put up a $10,000 reward for information about the case. San Diego was found after several weeks and ex-veterinarian Cathy Crighton was charged with stealing the horse, the Sun Sentinel reported. The Manaforts sold the Wellington, Florida property in 2004, according to the Tampa Bay Times. Other properties initially purchased in Kathleen's name have cropped up in the indictment. Bloomberg reported Kathleen bought a $400,000 lot in Southhampton in 1992. The subsequent $5.6 million house included a pool and a tennis court. In 2002, she received a $150,000 mortgage on the home from a bank run by Jared Kushner's dad. Two years later, Thomas Barrack Jr. — a close friend of Trump's — gave her a $1.76 million mortgage for the house. In 2007, Kathleen Manafort appears during the May 17, 2007 minutes of the Town of Southampton's zoning board, when she requested relief from certain "residential district dimensional regulations" for the property. And NBC reported the deed for the home was transferred to Paul Manafort's Summberbreeze LLC in 2016. The indictment indicated Paul Manafort used offshore accounts to spend money on "personal items," including a total of $6,090,293 on a home improvement company and a landscaper in the Hamptons, Business Insider reported. According to Curbed, Paul Manafort was subpoenaed for a $3.5 million mortgage on the home. Beyond public records about property purchases, not much is known about the relationship between Kathleen and Paul Manafort. However, during the investigation, tabloids attacked the couple's marriage, Heavy.com reported. The National Enquirer — which is owned by American Media CEO David Pecker, a friend of Trump's — has printed stories alleging Paul Manafort was having an affair with a much-younger woman. And in March, allegedly hacked text messages between the Manaforts' two daughters Andrea and Jessica indicated that their parents' marriage was in trouble. Business Insider reported Andrea appeared to to say her parents couldn't go through a "public divorce" because it would unearth "too many skeletons." Join the conversation about this story » NOW WATCH: Watch Paul Manafort — Trump's former campaign chairman — surrender to the FBI from http://www.businessinsider.com/paul-manafort-wife-kathleen-manafort Former Trump aide deactivated his Facebook and got a new cell number after lying to the FBI10/30/2017
Six days later, Papadopoulos got a new cell phone number, according to documents related to special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election. Earlier this month, Papadopoulos pleaded guilty for lying to FBI agents during a January 27 interview about "the timing, extent, and nature of his relationships and interactions with certain foreign nationals whom he understood to have close connections with senior Russian government officials." After a second interview with FBI officials on February 16, Papadopoulos scrambled to delete his Facebook account to obscure communications he had with an "overseas professor" with ties to high-level Russian officials. The details of Papadopoulos' guilty plea were unveiled on Monday along with indictments against former Trump campaign manager, Paul Manafort, and his deputy associate, Rick Gates. During the FBI interrogations, Papadopoulos described the professor as “a nothing," even though it was later revealed he knew the professor had significant ties to the Kremlin. The court documents say that Papadopoulos "repeatedly sought to use the professor's Russian connections in an effort to arrange a meeting between the [Trump] campaign and Russian government officials." In one instance, according to The New York Times, the professor told Papadopoulos that Moscow had "dirt" on Hillary Clinton, including "thousands of emails." After Papadopoulos deleted his Facebook account, he created a new one that did not contain communications with the professor. Shortly thereafter, he began using a new cell phone number. On July 27, Papadopoulos was arrested upon arriving at Dulles International Airport in Washington, DC. He has since complied with Mueller's probe and met with government investigators on numerous occassions to answer questions. SEE ALSO: Early Trump campaign adviser pleaded guilty to making false statements about Russia contacts to FBI DON'T MISS: Meet Rick Gates — the Trump ally indicted in the Russia probe and charged with conspiracy against the US Join the conversation about this story » from http://www.businessinsider.com/george-papadopoulos-trump-evidence-contact-russians-fbi-2017-10 Are women too fragile for the workplace? Dr Charlotte Proudman has today come to blows with TV presenter Anne Robinson who, at a time of heightened sensitivity around sex harassment allegations, claimed some women are fragile and cannot cope with the treachery of the workplace. The Goldsmith Chambers barrister hit headlines in 2015 when she went public with a sexist message she received from law firm partner Alexander Carter-Silk, in which he said she was “stunning”. Proudman, who recently completed a doctorate at the University of Cambridge, tweeted the “offensive” and “misogynistic” comment for all to see. Though many women have used social media as a forum to shame sexist behaviour in the wake of the Harvey Weinstein scandal, at the time not everyone thought Proudman’s actions were justified. One law firm boss, Franklin Sinclair of Tuckers Solicitors, tweeted to the legal aid barrister:
Proudman eventually left Twitter amid abuse from trolls who called her a “greedy little tart” and a “slag”. Speaking this morning on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, hosted by Nick Robinson and John Humphrys, Proudman reaffirmed her position that unwanted messages about women’s appearance, like that she received via LinkedIn, are sexual harassment. A message sent via social media will to some seem a world away from serious sexual assault. Should these instances be treated in the same way? Proudman said:
Later in the show — in which Vicky Featherstone, artistic director of the Royal Court theatre, also took part — Proudman stressed how important it is to the fight against harassment to have a better gender balance at the top. “To ensure a collective power balance between men and women we need more women in senior positions who will then be able to speak out,” she said. Both law firms and chambers have come under fire for their lack of senior female talent. Aside from recalling her LinkedIn sexism row, Keele University graduate Proudman also had a run-in with journalist and broadcaster Robinson. The Weakest Link presenter shocked many when she said:
Looking back at her career as a journalist in what used to be a very macho industry, she said of women’s reaction to sexist men: “In my day, we gave them a slap, and told them to grow up!” Her comments have caused outrage on social media.
Perhaps lucky, then, that feminist Proudman was in the radio studio to dispute them. She said:
The post Charlotte Proudman vs Anne Robinson: On-air battle over female response to sexism appeared first on Legal Cheek. from https://www.legalcheek.com/2017/10/charlotte-proudman-vs-anne-robinson-on-air-battle-over-female-response-to-sexism/ |
AuthorHi I am Alana Smith 35 years old living in New York. I am working as an assistant in local law office. I like to share legal news with people to educate them. Archives
April 2019
Categories |